Welcome

Anti Essays offers essay examples to help students with their essay writing.

Sign Up

“Between 1933 and 1937, the British Public’s Hostility to the Confrontation of Foreign Powers Left the National Government with No Alternative to a Policy of Appeasing Hitler and Mussolini.” – How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement? Essay

  • Submitted by: frunkandmai
  • on November 19, 2013
  • Category: History
  • Length: 1,151 words

Open Document

Below is an essay on "“Between 1933 and 1937, the British Public’s Hostility to the Confrontation of Foreign Powers Left the National Government with No Alternative to a Policy of Appeasing Hitler and Mussolini.” – How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

“Between 1933 and 1937, the British public’s hostility to the confrontation of foreign powers left the National Government with no alternative to a policy of appeasing Hitler and Mussolini.” – How far do you agree with this judgement?

Due to the aftermath of the First World War and the oncoming threat of further war, the general public opinion was to avoid war at all costs during the time between 1933 and 1937. It was in British interests to maintain peace because of similar reasons, and because of the state of the British economy. The British public were therefore not hostile to confrontation of foreign powers, but wanted to avoid the conflict, meaning there was a strong influence on the National Government to please the general public, and appeasement was a better option than to use violence.

The public opinion of wanting to be peaceful was the main reason why the National Government felt as if there was no alternative to appeasing Hitler and Mussolini. It was important to recognise the opinion of the people and to try and fulfil it, especially between 1933 and 1937, because of the general election of 1935. The National Government announced plans of avoiding war and rearmament benefits; meanwhile, details of the Hoare-Laval Pact were being agreed between Britain and France. The major issues that the public were concerned with over the election was the promise of peace, the continuing problem of unemployment, and the role of the League of Nations. When details of the Pact were released by the press, the public were outraged, and the Labour Party claimed if the reports in the press of the contents of the Pact were true, then the government was contradicting the pro-League policy it had just won the election on. Politicians felt as if the government was breaking election promises, and this influenced the public opinion, resulting in the abandonment of the Hoare-Laval Pact. The government were therefore left with no alternative to their actions, because they...

Show More


  • Submitted by: frunkandmai
  • on November 19, 2013
  • Category: History
  • Length: 1,151 words
  • Views: 533
  • Popularity Rank: 112731
  • 1 rating(s)

Citations

MLA Citation

"“Between 1933 and 1937, the British Public’s Hostility to the Confrontation of Foreign Powers Left the National Government with No Alternative to a Policy of Appeasing Hitler and Mussolini.” – How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?". Anti Essays. 10 Dec. 2018

<http://snehaedu.com/free-essays/Between-1933-And-1937-The-British-547589.html>

APA Citation

“Between 1933 and 1937, the British Public’s Hostility to the Confrontation of Foreign Powers Left the National Government with No Alternative to a Policy of Appeasing Hitler and Mussolini.” – How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?. Anti Essays. Retrieved December 10, 2018, from the World Wide Web: http://snehaedu.com/free-essays/Between-1933-And-1937-The-British-547589.html